The possibility of 24-hour operations at the Victoria Falls border post, a key artery linking Zambia and Zimbabwe, has gained traction. Discussions on this proposal are underway, with stakeholders highlighting both potential benefits and challenges.
The impetus for this initiative comes from the tourism sector, which views extended border hours as a significant advantage. Tourism Minister Rodney Sikumba of Zambia emphasized the negative impact of current operating limitations on small businesses. Extending border hours would cater to a wider range of travelers and potentially boost tourism revenue in both countries.
However, implementing 24-hour operations necessitates addressing several logistical hurdles. Stakeholders have raised concerns regarding staffing, security, and infrastructure limitations at the border post.
Manning the border for extended hours would require additional personnel from immigration, customs, and security forces. Both Zambia and Zimbabwe would need to assess their capacity to provide adequate staffing around the clock. Furthermore, ensuring robust security measures throughout the night would be crucial.
Upgrades to the infrastructure can also be required. To guarantee successful operations during the night, enough lighting, appropriate signs, and maybe even more processing booths could be needed.
The potential advantages of 24-hour border operations outweigh the difficulties. One important result might be an increase in trade between the two countries. Faster goods movement would be advantageous to businesses on both sides and could even spur economic growth.
The tourism sector, as previously mentioned, stands to gain considerably. Tourists visiting the majestic Victoria Falls wouldn’t be restricted by border operating hours, enhancing their travel experience. Additionally, businesses catering to tourists, such as hotels, restaurants, and tour operators, could potentially extend their hours to cater to late-night arrivals and departures.
However, potential drawbacks also require consideration. Increased traffic flow at night could lead to congestion, especially if infrastructure upgrades are not undertaken. The impact on nearby residents who might be disturbed by nighttime activity at the border post would also need to be addressed.
The business community, people, government officials, and border personnel should all be included in open conversations to ensure a successful implementation. It will be crucial to come up with a solution that takes into account everyone’s needs.
The choice to increase border hours ultimately rests on a careful cost-benefit evaluation. A 24-hour operation might benefit Zambia and Zimbabwe if the possible economic benefits exceed the logistical difficulties and possible disruptions.
The viability and timing of this proposal’s implementation will be determined in the upcoming months. To arrive at a decision that benefits both countries and promotes further regional integration, open communication, cooperation, and an emphasis on maximizing advantages while limiting negatives will be crucial.
